Life in 18th century France was probably far from easy, although less difficult for some. The aristocracy were living relatively comfortable lives, where the very small minority were enjoying privileges that the large masses could only dream of. In fact, they couldn’t even dream there was such privileges. And we all remember the allegedly immortal words of the well-meaning but clueless Marie Antoinette: “But if the people don’t have bread, why don’t they eat cakes?”.
I would guess that the aristocracy didn’t really understand what the fuss was all about: “Why are these people upset? We have always taken care of them. We know what is best for them. They don’t need to worry their heads with the problems of the world, they are not even interested anyway…”. And we know what happened: the aristocracy didn’t have to worry about haircuts ever again…
That attitude feels strangely familiar… And sure, with more rights comes more responsibilities. The right to vote is still not universal, and in Sweden, women didn’t have the same rights to vote as men until 1919. I don’t know about you, but in my opinion, my health is more important to me than who is the prime minister in Sweden (sure, the two are not independent but still).
People often tell me: “But Sara, you have to remember that not all patients are as engaged as you, you are an outlier…” My response is always: “I know that I am an engaged, knowledgable autonomous patient now, but 7 years ago I wasn’t, I was just an ordinary patient.”
The French Revolution, The Suffragett Movement and the Anti-apartheid Movement were all started by outliers. The masses were probably not very interested in what they were shouting about, they just wanted to do their best of a difficult situation… at first…
In my opinion, large parts of healthcare’s logic is based on the assumption that the doctor always knows best. And we patients have accepted that assumption for centuries, but times are changing.
We want to take more responsibility when it comes to our health!
The world cannot afford letting patients’ engagement and knowledge be wasted any longer!
A google search for “What is health?” just resulted in approximately 23 200 000 hits and I think that the number of different answers to the question is far greater still. The quote to the left is one of my favourite phrases about health and it is by the American 19th century author, poet, philosopher and much more, Henry David Thoreau. His words really resonates with me, as a person living with a difficult chronic progressive disease, health is not something I take for granted . But, and it is a big but, I also know that I have everything to gain from being an active participant rather than a passive bystander in the “battle” of my health.
In Parkinson’s, our neurologists assess our health using an almost infinite number of different scales; generic scales like EQ-5D, SF-36, EuroQoL or specific like UPDRS, PDQ-39 and many many more. To my mind those scales have very little to do with my own understanding of health. They are probably useful within healthcare, when you want to compare treatment results across clinics or make health economic evaluations. But do they REALLY measure health?
My personal definition of health is to not allow my condition to limit my life while at the same time not take unnecessary risks.
Given that my most troublesome symptom of Parkinson’s is freezing-of-gait, a strange phenomenon causing my feet to literally seem like they are stuck to the ground (see film clip below), especially in stressful situations, like for example crossing a busy street, you can see where the potential risks would come in.
Of course my definition is pretty much impossible to quantify in an objective manner but nevertheless, this is the way I want to live my life. And healthcare is aware of the risks associated with freezing-of-gait. In fact, freezing-of-gait is seen as a serious symptom, due to the obvious risk of falling and therefore is given a lot of attention from our neurologists. And they have treatments to offer for “advanced Parkinson’s disease”, which this symptom can be one of the signs of. My neurologist has told me that research has shown that with my combination of symptoms, I am likely to be a candidate for deep brain stimulation (DBS), a surgical procedure where electrodes are placed deep into the brain and connected to a kind of “brain pacemaker” placed under your collar bone. Don’t get me wrong, I have plenty of friends who have had this procedure with very good results and I am very happy that advanced treatments are available. But I am determined to make sure I have tried everything else in my powers before I let someone poke my brain while I’m awake (yes, the operation is performed with the patient awake to ensure that the desired effect is achieved from the electrodes…).
In summary, healthcare’s solution to my main problem is something I want to stay away from for as long as possible. And if I wasn’t such a difficult patient (I sometimes call myself a “patient extremist”), I might have gone for the operation. Instead I went to Portugal for a week of intensive neurorehabilitation (see more here and here) and came back with new insights and belief in my own abilities. Portugal gave me a good start and I know I need to keep working on it. I also know that I may still need the operation at some stage but am now convinced that it will be some time yet.
In short: healthcare knows a lot about medicine, but to me health is a bigger concept than medicine and healthcare doesn’t always have the right answers to my questions.
I share my birthday with someone very famous, I would say that almost everybody in the world know his name. At least we all know his work or rather, the result of his work. Nicolaus Copernicus was born 498 years ahead of me, to the day, and of course his work fundamentally changed the way we view the world, literally. I think our similarities start and end with both being born on the 19th of February.
Copernicus was born as the fourth child to a Preussian merchant and his wife and he truly was a child of the Renaissance. He had a doctorate in Canon law and was also a physician, astronomer, classics scholar, translator, governor, diplomat and economist (Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaus_Copernicus).
The work of Copernicus was further developed by Danish nobleman and astronomer Tycho Brahe (known to have died as a result of refusing to violate etiquette by leaving a banquet to go pee), German scientist Johannes Kepler and Italian scientist Galilei Galileo. The book Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, Latin for “Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy“, often referred to as simply the Principia by English mathematician and sir Isaac Newton confirmed the hypothesis of Copernicus a “mere” 155 years after it was postulated.
You are probably wondering what this unwarranted history lesson has to do with healthcare? Well, in my view, healthcare is in dire need of a Copernican Revolution. We need to go from the current healthcare-centric paradigm of healthcare to the natural and, to me, obvious patient-centric paradigm. “But”, I hear you say, “surely healthcare is already and has always been putting the patient in the centre of attention”. Sure, but “the centre of attention” is not the same as being patient-centric. Let me give you an example:
A friend of mine spent some time in the hospital recently. He also has Parkinson’s and since he took ill rather suddenly, he didn’t have his medications with him to the hospital. If you know something about Parkinson’s, you know that our medications are what keeps us going, keeps us moving, and without it, we would not be able to function very well. My friend had notified the nurses at the ward about his problem and told them that he needed to have his medications as soon as possible. They told him that they would get him what he needed when the hospital pharmacy opened at 10 o’clock the next morning. The next morning came and my friend reminded the nurses of his need. He was told that they would get his medications in due time. My friend was becoming increasingly rigid and he tried to tell the nurses that he really needed his medications. At this point, he was probably recognised as “another one of those difficult patients who think they know our job better than we do” and all the while he was getting less and less able to move by the minute. When a nurse finally arrived with the medication he needed, she had to put them in his mouth as he was no longer able to do it himself. He told her to come back in half an hour and she wondered if he would really need more medication that soon. No, he said, I want you to see the effect these drugs have on me. She came back with a colleague 45 minutes later and the patient she had left not even able to raise his hand to his mouth, was now sitting up straight in a chair, cheerfully reading a newspaper. He saw her surprise and said “Can you see what the medications do for me? Do you understand now why I need my pills when I say I need them and not when it suits your schedule?”.
The transition from a healthcare-centric system to a patient-centric one will not be easy, no more than the transition to a heliocentric view of the world was.
But I sincerely hope that we won’t have to wait 155 years for it to be completed!